This is a theory that I myself adhere to. When I tell others about it they automatically think me quite insane and immediately blow me off as a nut case. If I were seeking others approval on my theories then I might be worried. But I'm not. I am so sure of the validity of my theory that I don't care what others think. Eventually my theory will be proven out.
What are Pod People you ask? Well let me explain.
What I mean when I refer to Pod People are those people out here in society that have in a strange kind of way been removed from mainstream society and placed in a protective cocoon of sorts away from the general population.
Pod People are actors, actresses, artists, politicians, news media, anyone known to the masses on a large scale. You could even say that evangelists, murderers, con men, scientists, radio talking heads, etc., anyone who is well known but yet so far out of reach from the mainstream that they are considered "famous" on some level.
How do these people become Pod People you ask? That's easy if you know what is really going on. They start out life just like us, but at some point very early on in their lives they enter into a life that they can never return from. You could say they are scarred for life so to speak.
There has always been talk of an underground child sex slavery ring that is run primarily in the US but actually it is really throughout the world, but primarily here in this country. Other countries such as Thailand, UAE (Dubai) are prominent countries that engage in this as well.
The people or "entities" I should say that run this ring are the elite of the elites, people so rich and well off that they are impossible to identify by regular people. They are known, but only to those who are elite as well.
Word has escaped about this over time. It is impossible to keep something like this secret when you are dealing with people on such a large scale.
The Pod People as I said start out as very, very young children. There are three ways that they can become Pod People. The first way is when the parents sell their children into "a better way of life". Patty Duke is an example of this. The entire Jackson family was subjected to this. There is not one sane family member out of all those children. Any of the Hollywood set where the mothers are still in the lives of the child. They have been literally given over to the elites (sex slavery ring) in exchange for money, fame, etc. Second, you have the abducted children on milk cartons, on posters, etc. They are abducted, but not by family members. They are abducted by people who are paid to find sacrifices. Three, they are born into it of Pod Parents. An example of this is John Travolta's son who committed suicide. Very obvious what happened there.
Children can be used for various things. Throw aways. The ones no one cares about.There are clearing houses for them. Different places they are taken for different things. Some are for magical rituals, some for sex, some for prostitution, some for torture, some for crime, etc. They are used in many different capacities.
As these children get older, there are those that are not needed anymore since they were only desired at particular ages. Some die in rituals, some continue on depending on their talents and abilities and whether or not they are favored. But many are cast out. Not back into society as regular people, but they are placed in various places in our society that will keep them out of the mainstream.
Those that can sing or act go to Hollywood or New York, those that can write or speak will become newscasters, authors, playwrites, radio personalities, etc. The athletic ones go on to sports and becoming freaks for television. Those that show aptitude for politics will be groomed for that. Lawyers or heads of states. Barry Sotero is a perfect example of what I am talking about.
Sotero mysteriously appeared one day. We are told that he had a mother and father, but both are mysteriously dead and very little is known about them. The school records are all sealed and the birth certificate isn't legit. But, somehow, by some great miracle Sotero has the money to go to 3 good colleges. We don't know what schools prior to college he attended. But Columbia, Occidental and Harvard is where he attended College. Not to mention he finds the money to travel around the world during his college time as well. It is a known fact in a small circle that Zbigniew Brzezinski hand picked Sotero himself and mentored him and made things "possible" for him. In other words he was groomed from a small age to do what he is doing now. He speaks well, but has no real brain of his own.
These people have been raised from very early ages as homosexuals, prostitutes, etc. Their job was to please. What most people refuse to believe is that there is a massive child sex slavery ring working in this country and hundreds of children every year are brought into it.
Most children just don't run away from home. They don't. How many runaways do you know personally? Probably not that many. How many cities have you been to where the teenage runaway population is so massive that you can't avoid recognizing it? How many orphanages have you ever seen where children were actually there? I have seen some in my life and I have yet to ever see anyone at them.
Those children that are brought into the sex slavery ring, that can't handle it are usually extreme drug abusers or commit suicide. Here we have the Lady GaGa's that are totally out to lunch, Britney Spears who thinks that she is the antichrist, Lindsay Lohan who is just a hair's breath away from telling what really happened to her. Tiger Woods, OJ Simpson, Michael Vick. There are hundreds of these examples.
There are those that are on the streets because they have no talent to exploit, but are so messed up that no matter what they say they aren't taken seriously. Here are your "RUNAWAYS". Usually they end up in the nut house or dead.
Have you ever asked yourself why all of Hollywood and Washington are all gay? Are all on drugs? All cheat and lie? All only date or marry each other? If you were to put them all in a room you couldn't tell the difference between them. They are no longer fit for regular society - that's why they can't re-enter it. What they have lived through has been so traumatic that they can't handle regular everyday life.
If you look at things closely and notice the similarities in all these people and disregard the politically correct excuses of "it's the artist in them" or "what do you expect from politicians" then you can see that what I am saying is correct.
Take the time to look at the biographies of these people. Any of them. They all are children of prominent people in some form or fashion. Even if they aren't they have had the ability to enter schools that regular people can only dream about. They have had things handed to them like acting careers or corporate careers when they didn't come from anything at all. You have to ask yourself, "What is wrong with this picture"? How many regular people personally know people like this? And if you do, do you really know them at all?
They became Pod People, unfit for normal society. They live out their lives that way, never to know REAL life again.
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Thursday, May 6, 2010
What is a True Manchurian Candidate?
How many times have you watched the 1962 movie "The Manchurian Candidate"? I know I have seen it many, many times. I can just about tell you the movie scene by scene. I can quote the lines. I know the story. Or I thought I did. Until a few days ago that is.
If you were asked the question "What is a manchurian candidate"? what would you answer? Most people would say that a manchurian candidate is someone who is robotically controlled by others to do their bidding. If that is the answer that you would give you would be wrong. I used to give that answer and I found out I was quite wrong indeed and the obvious, correct answer has always been staring me in the face and I didn't or wouldn't see it. I'm still not sure.
But needless to say I had that very question put to me a few days ago and this is what I learned from the conversation that took place once I gave the wrong answer.
Does anyone remember the scene from the movie where Mrs Iselin was talking to Raymond and she said the following:
"It has been decided that you will be dressed as a priest, to help you get away in the pandemonium afterwards. Chunjin will give you a two-piece Soviet Army sniper's rifle that fits nicely into a special bag. There's a spotlight booth that won't be in use. It's up under the roof on the Eighth Avenue side of the Garden. You will have absolutely clear, protected shooting. You are to shoot the presidential nominee through the head. And Johnny will rise gallantly to his feet and lift Ben Arthur's body in his arms, stand in front of the microphones and begin to speak. The speech is short. But it's the most rousing speech I've ever read. It's been worked on, here and in Russia, on and off, for over eight years. I shall force someone to take the body away from him and Johnny will really hit those microphones and those cameras with blood all over him, fighting off anyone who tries to help him, defending America even if it means his own death, rallying a nation of television viewers to hysteria, to sweep us up into the White House with powers that will make martial law seem like anarchy! Now, this is very important. I want the nominee to be dead two minutes after he begins his acceptance speech - depending on his reading time under pressure. You are to hit him right at the point that he finishes the phrase, "Nor would I ask of any fellow American in defense of his freedom that which I would not gladly give myself - my life before my liberty." Is that absolutely clear?
I know you will never entirely comprehend this, Raymond, but you must believe I did not know it would be you. I served them. I fought for them. I'm on the point of winning for them the greatest foothold they would ever have in this country. And they paid me back by taking your soul away from you. I told them to build me an assassin. I wanted a killer from a world filled with killers and they chose you because they thought it would bind me closer to them.
But now, we have come almost to the end. One last step. And then when I take power, they will be pulled down and ground into dirt for what they did to you. And what they did in so contemptuously underestimating me."
It is at this point that you realize who the manchurian candidate actually is. It is Mrs Iselin. Not Johnny, not Raymond. Raymond is a robotic tool who is needed in order to help usher in the Iselins into office. Johnny is necessary in the sense that he is the man and only men can or have been elected to office in American history. Mrs Iselin needs Johnny to get elected in order so that she can obtain power. Raymond needs to clear the pathway for the Iselins to get into office. But Mrs Iselin is clearly the manchurian candidate.
When we see various people committing crimes and trying to reveal that they were only patsies or used as decoys or what have you. They are not manchurian candidates. They are in fact nothing more than mind controlled slaves which is very different from a manchurian candidate.
Modern day manchurian candidates would have to be people like Hillary Clinton. She would be the closest thing to a Mrs Iselin. The way that her marriage was/is portrayed to the public, yet known as fact to be the total opposite. I would have to say that Hillary is the best example. Some would say that Nancy Reagan was the power behind the man. She may have been but for very different reasons. She didn't seek power so much as her husband was dependent on her being honest and loyal to him. He would take her advice before listening to his own advisors. But it wasn't about ultimate power with her.
Eva Peron was another manchurian candidate. Corazon Aquino was another, as well as Imelda Marcos. There are of course men who are manchurian candidates but I am pointing out the females specifically. The movie made the point that the wife was the power hungry one. It is easier for us to see a power hungry male before we spot the power hungry female. Hillary was such a perfect example because she made no effort at all to hide her goals. She makes it quite clear what she is focused on and she cares not what anyone else thinks. Rude as that may be, it nevertheless is the fact.
What fascinates me is the fact that I have watched that movie over and over and over again and it never registered with me. Not for a moment. Then it had to be explained to me in detail before I caught the drift. Did I feel like a fool? Oh yes. But it changed my thinking and the way I look at things. It actually helped bring some things into much sharper focus. Now I look at things much differently. How I could have been so stupid for so long is devastating to me. But at least I finally got it.
This is a very real problem with the people of this country, maybe even the world. They are blinded. The powers that be can throw things up right in front of the people and they never seem to see them for what they really are. They can openly brag and never get caught. If a few people do catch it and speak out about it they are ridiculed and made to look like fools and imbeciles. That usually stops that right there and then.
The real manchurian candidates are the ones in power.
If you were asked the question "What is a manchurian candidate"? what would you answer? Most people would say that a manchurian candidate is someone who is robotically controlled by others to do their bidding. If that is the answer that you would give you would be wrong. I used to give that answer and I found out I was quite wrong indeed and the obvious, correct answer has always been staring me in the face and I didn't or wouldn't see it. I'm still not sure.
But needless to say I had that very question put to me a few days ago and this is what I learned from the conversation that took place once I gave the wrong answer.
Does anyone remember the scene from the movie where Mrs Iselin was talking to Raymond and she said the following:
"It has been decided that you will be dressed as a priest, to help you get away in the pandemonium afterwards. Chunjin will give you a two-piece Soviet Army sniper's rifle that fits nicely into a special bag. There's a spotlight booth that won't be in use. It's up under the roof on the Eighth Avenue side of the Garden. You will have absolutely clear, protected shooting. You are to shoot the presidential nominee through the head. And Johnny will rise gallantly to his feet and lift Ben Arthur's body in his arms, stand in front of the microphones and begin to speak. The speech is short. But it's the most rousing speech I've ever read. It's been worked on, here and in Russia, on and off, for over eight years. I shall force someone to take the body away from him and Johnny will really hit those microphones and those cameras with blood all over him, fighting off anyone who tries to help him, defending America even if it means his own death, rallying a nation of television viewers to hysteria, to sweep us up into the White House with powers that will make martial law seem like anarchy! Now, this is very important. I want the nominee to be dead two minutes after he begins his acceptance speech - depending on his reading time under pressure. You are to hit him right at the point that he finishes the phrase, "Nor would I ask of any fellow American in defense of his freedom that which I would not gladly give myself - my life before my liberty." Is that absolutely clear?
I know you will never entirely comprehend this, Raymond, but you must believe I did not know it would be you. I served them. I fought for them. I'm on the point of winning for them the greatest foothold they would ever have in this country. And they paid me back by taking your soul away from you. I told them to build me an assassin. I wanted a killer from a world filled with killers and they chose you because they thought it would bind me closer to them.
But now, we have come almost to the end. One last step. And then when I take power, they will be pulled down and ground into dirt for what they did to you. And what they did in so contemptuously underestimating me."
It is at this point that you realize who the manchurian candidate actually is. It is Mrs Iselin. Not Johnny, not Raymond. Raymond is a robotic tool who is needed in order to help usher in the Iselins into office. Johnny is necessary in the sense that he is the man and only men can or have been elected to office in American history. Mrs Iselin needs Johnny to get elected in order so that she can obtain power. Raymond needs to clear the pathway for the Iselins to get into office. But Mrs Iselin is clearly the manchurian candidate.
When we see various people committing crimes and trying to reveal that they were only patsies or used as decoys or what have you. They are not manchurian candidates. They are in fact nothing more than mind controlled slaves which is very different from a manchurian candidate.
Modern day manchurian candidates would have to be people like Hillary Clinton. She would be the closest thing to a Mrs Iselin. The way that her marriage was/is portrayed to the public, yet known as fact to be the total opposite. I would have to say that Hillary is the best example. Some would say that Nancy Reagan was the power behind the man. She may have been but for very different reasons. She didn't seek power so much as her husband was dependent on her being honest and loyal to him. He would take her advice before listening to his own advisors. But it wasn't about ultimate power with her.
Eva Peron was another manchurian candidate. Corazon Aquino was another, as well as Imelda Marcos. There are of course men who are manchurian candidates but I am pointing out the females specifically. The movie made the point that the wife was the power hungry one. It is easier for us to see a power hungry male before we spot the power hungry female. Hillary was such a perfect example because she made no effort at all to hide her goals. She makes it quite clear what she is focused on and she cares not what anyone else thinks. Rude as that may be, it nevertheless is the fact.
What fascinates me is the fact that I have watched that movie over and over and over again and it never registered with me. Not for a moment. Then it had to be explained to me in detail before I caught the drift. Did I feel like a fool? Oh yes. But it changed my thinking and the way I look at things. It actually helped bring some things into much sharper focus. Now I look at things much differently. How I could have been so stupid for so long is devastating to me. But at least I finally got it.
This is a very real problem with the people of this country, maybe even the world. They are blinded. The powers that be can throw things up right in front of the people and they never seem to see them for what they really are. They can openly brag and never get caught. If a few people do catch it and speak out about it they are ridiculed and made to look like fools and imbeciles. That usually stops that right there and then.
The real manchurian candidates are the ones in power.
Saturday, April 17, 2010
The Art of Tea Bagging or Where's The Party?"
I have noticed something recently in listening to the Tea Party nut cases, not to mention all the other people who are confused and misled by all the nonsensical mumbo jumbo that they are bombarded with day in and day out. I guess on one hand it makes sense and on the other it doesn't. I see why and how the masses are following blindly whatever group has been created for them and then again I can't believe that they can't see through the facade that has been created for them.
The people don't realize that the Tea Party has been created for them to give them the illusion of having a third choice in nothing. They believe that this new party is the answer to all their problems and that they just need to get the Tea Party "approved" members elected and all will be right with the world. They could not be more wrong.
Any political parties that exist have been created for the people to give them a false sense of being able to choose who their leaders will be. The people NEED to believe that they are able to choose and that ability was lost a LONG time ago (if they ever had it at all to begin with). The sad part about it is that the people can't see what is so obvious to them.
The Tea Party is no different than the Democratic or Republican Party or the Independent or the Green Party. Or any other party for that matter. But what the people seem to keep ignoring is the fact that if you look at each of those parties there is no difference in any of them.
Of course you will hear each of the parties claim different things about the other. The Republicans are conservative and the Democrats are liberals and so on and so forth,
Now the Tea Party has been touted to be the party that is going to get out all the politicians that are corrupt and not serving the voice and will of the people. In other words the Tea Party is the People's Party. They won't call it that of course. They want to be known as the Tea Party. Not the "Tea Baggers" or "Wing Nuts" or any other derogatory names that float around the media. But the names come out from time to time by people who want to denigrate that particular party.
Don't get me wrong I don't care about any of the parties, but it is the sport of politics that continues to fascinate me. I personally believe that the sport of politics is more brutal than the most physical of regular contact sports. And just like regular sports that can be watched on many channels any time of the day or night you can catch the game of politics.
Not only do you have the political party teams but you have the media teams as well. Sometimes you get the chance to see the media teams go against the political teams. But the one thing that you can count on is that every single game is fixed. Just like in regular sports. The winner has already been determined. It's just set up so that the people feel like they are watching something where the outcome has not been previously determined. When in fact every single word and act are all scripted. But what makes things interesting is when something unplanned and unexpected gets out and no one knows what to do. That 10 second delay doesn't do any good sometimes.
If you ever notice when watching the talking heads and the politicians that the politicians never seem to get away from their "talking points". No matter what you ask them. Ask them how they are doing or say "Good Morning" to them and what do they do? Start on the talking points. Much like robotic puppets. I wonder if they do that when they are at home with their families? When little Johnny comes up to daddy who's a state senator and asks him to help him with his 4th grade homework and Daddy (upon being asked to help with the homework) all of a sudden breaks into his talking points on Health Care or Taxes. Does Johnny just roll his eyes and walk away realizing that once again Daddy dearest is so far out of touch with reality that he cannot function outside of the warm, protective womb of Washington politics? Probably.
Power (no matter in what form or fashion) is a dangerous thing. But the one thing that is the saddest to watch is politicians chasing power. They are so obvious, pathetic and actually quite shameless. If you look at them closely they all have the same look about them, especially the old ones. What the people fail to see is that they (the people themselves) mean nothing to the politicians, the people are incidental. The politicians are there for themselves, nothing else.
The people have already been shown over and over ad nauseum how the government feels, yet the people blindly continue believing that politicians will somehow magically change and start caring. Hence, the Tea Party. That party is being thrown out there to entertain and sidetrack the people. And the people won't or can't see it for what it is. I find that fascinating.
The Tea Partiers are going to realize in the not too distant future that they have been had yet again by the powers that be. They are going to realize that there is no GOOD politicians, just corrupt ones. It is already starting in fact. Take Scott Brown from Massachusetts. The Tea Partiers practically forced him into office by their sheer numbers and will power. But he turned on them and now wants nothing to do with them. Of course he has to worry about his re-election campaign but that's in 4-6 years. By then he will have achieved something that should guarantee his re-election. Plus he has the gift of the people's short memory span to bank on.
Like I said, it's all the same. The people just don't want to see it for what it is.
The people don't realize that the Tea Party has been created for them to give them the illusion of having a third choice in nothing. They believe that this new party is the answer to all their problems and that they just need to get the Tea Party "approved" members elected and all will be right with the world. They could not be more wrong.
Any political parties that exist have been created for the people to give them a false sense of being able to choose who their leaders will be. The people NEED to believe that they are able to choose and that ability was lost a LONG time ago (if they ever had it at all to begin with). The sad part about it is that the people can't see what is so obvious to them.
The Tea Party is no different than the Democratic or Republican Party or the Independent or the Green Party. Or any other party for that matter. But what the people seem to keep ignoring is the fact that if you look at each of those parties there is no difference in any of them.
Of course you will hear each of the parties claim different things about the other. The Republicans are conservative and the Democrats are liberals and so on and so forth,
Now the Tea Party has been touted to be the party that is going to get out all the politicians that are corrupt and not serving the voice and will of the people. In other words the Tea Party is the People's Party. They won't call it that of course. They want to be known as the Tea Party. Not the "Tea Baggers" or "Wing Nuts" or any other derogatory names that float around the media. But the names come out from time to time by people who want to denigrate that particular party.
Don't get me wrong I don't care about any of the parties, but it is the sport of politics that continues to fascinate me. I personally believe that the sport of politics is more brutal than the most physical of regular contact sports. And just like regular sports that can be watched on many channels any time of the day or night you can catch the game of politics.
Not only do you have the political party teams but you have the media teams as well. Sometimes you get the chance to see the media teams go against the political teams. But the one thing that you can count on is that every single game is fixed. Just like in regular sports. The winner has already been determined. It's just set up so that the people feel like they are watching something where the outcome has not been previously determined. When in fact every single word and act are all scripted. But what makes things interesting is when something unplanned and unexpected gets out and no one knows what to do. That 10 second delay doesn't do any good sometimes.
If you ever notice when watching the talking heads and the politicians that the politicians never seem to get away from their "talking points". No matter what you ask them. Ask them how they are doing or say "Good Morning" to them and what do they do? Start on the talking points. Much like robotic puppets. I wonder if they do that when they are at home with their families? When little Johnny comes up to daddy who's a state senator and asks him to help him with his 4th grade homework and Daddy (upon being asked to help with the homework) all of a sudden breaks into his talking points on Health Care or Taxes. Does Johnny just roll his eyes and walk away realizing that once again Daddy dearest is so far out of touch with reality that he cannot function outside of the warm, protective womb of Washington politics? Probably.
Power (no matter in what form or fashion) is a dangerous thing. But the one thing that is the saddest to watch is politicians chasing power. They are so obvious, pathetic and actually quite shameless. If you look at them closely they all have the same look about them, especially the old ones. What the people fail to see is that they (the people themselves) mean nothing to the politicians, the people are incidental. The politicians are there for themselves, nothing else.
The people have already been shown over and over ad nauseum how the government feels, yet the people blindly continue believing that politicians will somehow magically change and start caring. Hence, the Tea Party. That party is being thrown out there to entertain and sidetrack the people. And the people won't or can't see it for what it is. I find that fascinating.
The Tea Partiers are going to realize in the not too distant future that they have been had yet again by the powers that be. They are going to realize that there is no GOOD politicians, just corrupt ones. It is already starting in fact. Take Scott Brown from Massachusetts. The Tea Partiers practically forced him into office by their sheer numbers and will power. But he turned on them and now wants nothing to do with them. Of course he has to worry about his re-election campaign but that's in 4-6 years. By then he will have achieved something that should guarantee his re-election. Plus he has the gift of the people's short memory span to bank on.
Like I said, it's all the same. The people just don't want to see it for what it is.
Saturday, February 6, 2010
One Year Later and What Do We Have To Show For It?
Change You Can Believe In. Wasn't that the campaign slogan? Wasn't that what everyone was getting drunk on? Wasn't that the mantra? Yes, I believe it was. Very coy of them to create that slogan. Ambiguous. Doesn't make people think very much. A slogan that can easily be taken at face value. But one that BEGS to be investigated further. The one thing that MOST people did not do. They wrongly and erroneously ASSUMED that it naturally meant something good. When in all reality it was a very ominous warning that was not heeded but instead IGNORED. How we are paying for that error now.
People haven't learned yet after 2000 years that the next leader is always going to be worse than his/her predecessor. Very rarely do you get a benevolent leader after a bad one. Rest assured the exception is not present here. The norm has in fact happened (yet again).
What I have noticed this time around is that the mainstream media (drive by's) have become even more polarized. The "alternative" media isn't as alternative as one would like to think. When you take everything the mainstream and alternative media talk about there is not a dime's worth of difference between any of them. But if you try to tell someone that (who is deathly loyal to their favorite news outlet) you will likely get into a fist fight with them.
I find it more and more interesting myself. All of them have their weaknesses. All of the talking heads are human and are subject to their consciences. They can be told what to say all day long. But there comes a time with each and every one of us when we have to interject our own feelings. It cannot be avoided. We are emotionally driven creatures who are in fact not only emotional but dramatically inclined as well. Look around you at the talking heads and see if you can spot the "drama queens". I can name two right off the top if not more.
Let's look at the mainstream media and see if we can spot them, shall we?
1, Bill O'Reilly (Fox)
2. Keith Olbermann (MSNBC)
3. Chris Matthews (MSNBC)
4. Shaun Hannity (Fox)
5. Glenn Beck (Fox)
6. Joe Scarborough (MSNBC)
7. Ed Schultz (MSNBC)
8. Rick Santelli (CNBC)
9. Mark Haynes (CNBC)
Radio Talking Heads
9. Rush Limbaugh (ABC)
10. Mark Levin (ABC)
11. Alex Jones (GCN)
12. Michael Savage (TRN)
These are personalities (Radio & TV) that are KNOWN to spout their own personal views despite what their bosses tell them to say. These people are:
1. hot-tempered
2. outspoken
3. aggressive
4. obnoxious
And these are just the ones I can think of right off the top of my head. If I sat down and thought about it I could come up with even more. But most of the talking heads do march in lock step with what their owners command them to. They are owned and operated by the corporations and spout what the corporations tell them to.
To bring my point home we need to remember the movie "Network" and the most critical dialog that took place between Arthur Jenson and Howard Beale.
I actually had the priviledge of watching literally the same type thing happen around the first of last year. Keith Olbermann (MSNBC) was always on Bush's ass. His show was primarily dedicated to denigrating Bush. But something mysterious happened right around inauguration time. Keith couldn't seem to work a full week anymore. He was consistently out and other people were doing his show for him. Nothing was ever really said about why he was out. Later on it was mentioned in passing that his mother had passed away. But that was a likely story. You don't miss 2 months of work because your mother dies.
Anyway, by the time he manages to pull himself together and make it back in to work fulltime his thinking has changed considerably. He isn't the old Keith from 2008. Now he is the new, improved Keith who touts the party line and refuses to hear anything negative about the new leader. Of course he still bashes Bush every chance he gets. But now he is a full fledged corporate robot who reads from the teleprompter and does not deviate. That is until something that he cares about comes into the conversation and then he goes off on a tirade. But never ignore the fact that those "Special Commentaries" of his are carefully gone over and he never really goes too far. He states his case but in very muted tones. He's not the little hothead of the Bush era. He is now more sedated and controlled. Unless of course they tell him to get passionate, then you see the epitomy of phoney passion.
Keith Olbermann dares to call Glenn Beck "Lonesome Rhodes" when Keith himself is "Howard Beale". Glenn Beck is in no way Lonesome Rhodes. Never could be. He doesn't have the style or the smoothness that reaches out and grabs the audience. If the audience reacts to him it is because they are just plain idiots who can mouth along with him. He doesn't do anything to make them feel special. Lonesome Rhodes did that.
Your president is more along the lines of Lonesome Rhodes. He actually embodies the very essence of Lonesome Rhodes. Even Keith can't claim true Howard Bealedom. He doesn't have the over the top passion that Beale did. You could never get Keith up on stage and out from behind his desk to speak to people in the way that Beale did. Keith hides behind his desk ALWAYS. You never see him in any other format.
The talking heads today, the shills (if you will) are lame. They have no personalities. They don't have the power to get anybody fired up about anything. Do you really think that if Keith Olbermann or Glenn Beck or even the loudmouth Alex Jones stood up and said "I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore", do you really think that they could inspire the rest of America to do the same thing like it was done in the movie "Network"? Do you really think that? I don't.
They are seen as what they are. The people know the game that is being played on them. They know. They just don't want to have to admit it until the time comes when they are forced to look at it for what it is. That time is just around the corner. They will be allowed to live in denial until the time comes when they are going to have to accept their place as true slaves. When everything is stripped from them and they have nothing. Then they will get mad. But then it will be too late. Any uprising that is done will be to no avail. They should have been dealing with this long ago. But the lure of easy money, fast cars, expensive toys, nice vacations, credit, big jobs, were too much to be ignored. They bought in and the time to pay is coming fast. They won't want to, but they will.
We all will. And when the people are weeping and gnashing their teeth over the loss of everything they can look in the mirror and thank themselves for their situation. They ushered it in themselves. They carried in their leader on their own shoulders and begged him to do just exactly what he is doing. But because they were in such a state of denial they had no idea of just what they were asking for and to what extent they would pay. But they will.
There will be some talking heads though that will break away from their handlers and bosses. The corporations will either throw them overboard or they will quit because their consciences won't let them continue. They will take their place back down here with the sodomites to suffer as they suffer. The others are too dumb to see that the very monster that they serve so diligently will eventually eat them alive. But do they care? I don't think so, because if they had a conscience they would already have trouble doing what they are doing.
It took Keith 2 months to get back and be the new and improved Keith Olbermann. 2 months. That's a long time to adjust to the new persona. They should have been able to give him his script and say "Read It" or "Just stick to the script" and he would robotically do as he was told. But something else was going on. Maybe momma did die, but that wasn't what was at the center of things. That was just a part of it. We'll see how much of a stomach Mr Olbermann has. Just give him a few more months of this.
People like Alex Jones though, he's bought and paid for. He is more like Lonesome Rhodes. Or Bill O'Reilly. They both could make a claim for the title but they would be weak imitations. Alex Jones has one thing going for him. He knows that if he steamrolls everything and doesn't slow down to let anyone else in, he can continue. But eventually younger blood will have to step in. O'Reilly the same way. His time is short too just because of age. Stretch your skin all you want, it doesn't turn back the clock. It just stretches your skin.
I have to admit that I am addicted to the news. I watch it. I have to. Because I know that the talking heads (regardless of shilling) are going to slip up and tell some truth. The only way we will ever get the truth is when someone slips up and lets some out. This is my opinion, there are others who violently disagree with this. But most people are too lazy to search for truth. They will tell you they don't have the time and some will even say they don't have the inclination, nor do they care. Those are the people who helped this situation along the most. I would blame them but it does no good. They are such experts at knowing how to not take blame for anything it does no good.
What I find astounding is the fact that most people have the nerve to try and argue that there is a difference between mainstream media and alternative media. But when you press them to distinguish the differences they can only prove that there are none. If you listen closely to both you will hear no difference. They both talk about the state of the situation. They both talk about citizenship, birthright, intelligence, transparency, health care, insurance, money, jobs, etc. They all talk about it. They just give their opinions on it. Without one the other would have no show. Example:
Keith Olbermann would have no show without Billo O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, etc. Those are the guys he has focused on. Those are his foils. By watching and listening to Keith you are naturally going to be curious about the others. Keith will play snippets and clips of those guys and your curiosity will be aroused. Now you have to hear for yourself what was said. Once you do that you are listening to them more often because they are bashing Olbermann. It's a game.
Chris Matthews has a hard on for the "Wing Nuts". Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Bill O'Reilly, Fox News, the Tea Party, etc. The more they talk about this stuff the more curious people get and want to check it out.
Same thing all the way around.
Rush Limbaugh talks about Fox and MSNBC constantly. He praises his enemies, thanks God for his enemies. They are his foils. He forces his listeners to check these people out by prophetically telling his listeners what the media and political elites are going to do. That is his speciality.
Mark Levin talks about the same thing but he uses cute little pet names for them all which of course raises curiousity.
IT'S A GAME AND IT WORKS LIKE A CHARM.
So one year later what do we have? Not much. Just worse. The talking heads tell you things are getting better. But all one has to do is look around him/herself and see if things are getting better or not. I don't see them getting better around me. But we have the future to look forward to (they will tell you). 40% higher taxes, forced health care, can't talk, can't think, can't act, can't work, can't eat, can't do nothing. Unless the government tells you that you can. That's what we have and are getting more of. Is this what they call the "good stuff"? I know it's change that you BETTER BELEIVE IN.
People haven't learned yet after 2000 years that the next leader is always going to be worse than his/her predecessor. Very rarely do you get a benevolent leader after a bad one. Rest assured the exception is not present here. The norm has in fact happened (yet again).
What I have noticed this time around is that the mainstream media (drive by's) have become even more polarized. The "alternative" media isn't as alternative as one would like to think. When you take everything the mainstream and alternative media talk about there is not a dime's worth of difference between any of them. But if you try to tell someone that (who is deathly loyal to their favorite news outlet) you will likely get into a fist fight with them.
I find it more and more interesting myself. All of them have their weaknesses. All of the talking heads are human and are subject to their consciences. They can be told what to say all day long. But there comes a time with each and every one of us when we have to interject our own feelings. It cannot be avoided. We are emotionally driven creatures who are in fact not only emotional but dramatically inclined as well. Look around you at the talking heads and see if you can spot the "drama queens". I can name two right off the top if not more.
Let's look at the mainstream media and see if we can spot them, shall we?
1, Bill O'Reilly (Fox)
2. Keith Olbermann (MSNBC)
3. Chris Matthews (MSNBC)
4. Shaun Hannity (Fox)
5. Glenn Beck (Fox)
6. Joe Scarborough (MSNBC)
7. Ed Schultz (MSNBC)
8. Rick Santelli (CNBC)
9. Mark Haynes (CNBC)
Radio Talking Heads
9. Rush Limbaugh (ABC)
10. Mark Levin (ABC)
11. Alex Jones (GCN)
12. Michael Savage (TRN)
These are personalities (Radio & TV) that are KNOWN to spout their own personal views despite what their bosses tell them to say. These people are:
1. hot-tempered
2. outspoken
3. aggressive
4. obnoxious
And these are just the ones I can think of right off the top of my head. If I sat down and thought about it I could come up with even more. But most of the talking heads do march in lock step with what their owners command them to. They are owned and operated by the corporations and spout what the corporations tell them to.
To bring my point home we need to remember the movie "Network" and the most critical dialog that took place between Arthur Jenson and Howard Beale.
The all-consummate corporate pitchman and business magnate Arthur Jensen, (an ex-salesman), summons Beale into his imposing conference room ("Valhalla"):
Jensen to Beale: "They say I can sell anything. I'd like to try to sell something to you."
In one of the best-acted scenes in the film, Jensen devastates Beale with an evangelical lecture - a hypnotic, spell-binding, convincing, God-like oratorical speech (mocking Beale's own style) about the facts of international business and commerce - the corporate mentality. He describes the unimportance of individuals and the overarching omnipotence of currency as the center of the universe:
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and I won't have it, is that clear?! You think you have merely stopped a business deal - that is not the case! The Arabs have taken billions of dollars out of this country, and now they must put it back. It is ebb and flow, tidal gravity, it is ecological balance. You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations! There are no peoples! There are no Russians! There are no Arabs! There are no Third Worlds! There is no West! There is only one holistic system of systems, one vast and immane, interwoven, interacting, multi-variate, multi-national dominion of dollars! Petro-dollars, electro-dollars, multi-dollars, reichmarks, rins, rubles, pounds and shekels! It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today. That is the atomic, and subatomic and galactic structure of things today. And you have meddled with the primal forces of nature, and you will atone!
He pauses for a moment - and speaks normally with a question to Beale, but then continues:
Am I getting through to you, Mr. Beale? You get up on your little twenty-one inch screen and howl about America and democracy. There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM, and ITT, and AT and T, and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide, and Exxon - those are the nations of the world today. What do you think the Russians talk about in their councils of state - Karl Marx? They get out their linear programming charts, statistical decision theories and mini-max solutions and compute the price-cost probabilities of their transactions and investments just like we do. We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, Mr. Beale. The world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable by-laws of business. The world is a business, Mr. Beale. It has been since man crawled out of the slime, and our children will live, Mr. Beale, to see that perfect world in which there's no war or famine, oppression or brutality. One vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit, in which all men will hold a share of stock, all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused. And I have chosen you to preach this evangel, Mr. Beale.
Terrified, Beale is pressured and forced by Jensen to continue preaching about dehumanization and the death of democracy. He returns to the airwaves to preach Jensen's corporate truth, championing corporate rather than individual human rights:
Narrator: "That evening, Howard Beale went on the air to preach the corporate cosmology of Arthur Jensen":
Last night, I got up here and asked you people to stand up and fight for your heritage, and you did, and it was beautiful. Six million telegrams were received at the White House. The Arab takeover of CCA has been stopped. The people spoke, the people won. It was a radiant eruption of democracy. But I think that was it, fellas. That sort of thing is not likely to happen again. Because in the bottom of all our terrified souls, we know that democracy is a dying giant, a sick, sick dying, decaying political concept, writhing in its final pain. I don't mean that the United States is finished as a world power. The United States is the richest, the most powerful, the most advanced country in the world, light-years ahead of any other country. And I don't mean the Communists are gonna take over the world because the Communists are deader than we are. What is finished is the idea that this great country is dedicated to the freedom and flourishing of every individual in it. It's the individual that's finished. It's the single, solitary human being that's finished. It's every single one of you out there that's finished. Because this is no longer a nation of independent individuals. It's a nation of some two hundred odd million transistorized, deodorized, whiter-than-white, steel-belted bodies, totally unnecessary as human beings and as replaceable as piston rods. Well, the time has come to say, 'Is dehumanization such a bad word?' Because good or bad, that's what is so. The whole world is becoming humanoid, creatures that look human but aren't. The whole world, not just us. We're just the most advanced country, so we're getting there first. The whole world's people are becoming mass-produced, programmed, numbered, insensate things...
However, the ratings for the Howard Beale show begin to fall again, now that he has alienated his viewing audience by preaching about the meaningless of their individual lives (and about "dying, democracy, and de-humanization"). The narrator describes the effect upon ratings:
Nobody particularly cared to hear his life was utterly valueless. By the end of the first week in June, the Howard Beale show had dropped one point in the ratings, and its trend of shares dipped under 48 for the first time since last November.
I actually had the priviledge of watching literally the same type thing happen around the first of last year. Keith Olbermann (MSNBC) was always on Bush's ass. His show was primarily dedicated to denigrating Bush. But something mysterious happened right around inauguration time. Keith couldn't seem to work a full week anymore. He was consistently out and other people were doing his show for him. Nothing was ever really said about why he was out. Later on it was mentioned in passing that his mother had passed away. But that was a likely story. You don't miss 2 months of work because your mother dies.
Anyway, by the time he manages to pull himself together and make it back in to work fulltime his thinking has changed considerably. He isn't the old Keith from 2008. Now he is the new, improved Keith who touts the party line and refuses to hear anything negative about the new leader. Of course he still bashes Bush every chance he gets. But now he is a full fledged corporate robot who reads from the teleprompter and does not deviate. That is until something that he cares about comes into the conversation and then he goes off on a tirade. But never ignore the fact that those "Special Commentaries" of his are carefully gone over and he never really goes too far. He states his case but in very muted tones. He's not the little hothead of the Bush era. He is now more sedated and controlled. Unless of course they tell him to get passionate, then you see the epitomy of phoney passion.
Keith Olbermann dares to call Glenn Beck "Lonesome Rhodes" when Keith himself is "Howard Beale". Glenn Beck is in no way Lonesome Rhodes. Never could be. He doesn't have the style or the smoothness that reaches out and grabs the audience. If the audience reacts to him it is because they are just plain idiots who can mouth along with him. He doesn't do anything to make them feel special. Lonesome Rhodes did that.
Your president is more along the lines of Lonesome Rhodes. He actually embodies the very essence of Lonesome Rhodes. Even Keith can't claim true Howard Bealedom. He doesn't have the over the top passion that Beale did. You could never get Keith up on stage and out from behind his desk to speak to people in the way that Beale did. Keith hides behind his desk ALWAYS. You never see him in any other format.
The talking heads today, the shills (if you will) are lame. They have no personalities. They don't have the power to get anybody fired up about anything. Do you really think that if Keith Olbermann or Glenn Beck or even the loudmouth Alex Jones stood up and said "I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore", do you really think that they could inspire the rest of America to do the same thing like it was done in the movie "Network"? Do you really think that? I don't.
They are seen as what they are. The people know the game that is being played on them. They know. They just don't want to have to admit it until the time comes when they are forced to look at it for what it is. That time is just around the corner. They will be allowed to live in denial until the time comes when they are going to have to accept their place as true slaves. When everything is stripped from them and they have nothing. Then they will get mad. But then it will be too late. Any uprising that is done will be to no avail. They should have been dealing with this long ago. But the lure of easy money, fast cars, expensive toys, nice vacations, credit, big jobs, were too much to be ignored. They bought in and the time to pay is coming fast. They won't want to, but they will.
We all will. And when the people are weeping and gnashing their teeth over the loss of everything they can look in the mirror and thank themselves for their situation. They ushered it in themselves. They carried in their leader on their own shoulders and begged him to do just exactly what he is doing. But because they were in such a state of denial they had no idea of just what they were asking for and to what extent they would pay. But they will.
There will be some talking heads though that will break away from their handlers and bosses. The corporations will either throw them overboard or they will quit because their consciences won't let them continue. They will take their place back down here with the sodomites to suffer as they suffer. The others are too dumb to see that the very monster that they serve so diligently will eventually eat them alive. But do they care? I don't think so, because if they had a conscience they would already have trouble doing what they are doing.
It took Keith 2 months to get back and be the new and improved Keith Olbermann. 2 months. That's a long time to adjust to the new persona. They should have been able to give him his script and say "Read It" or "Just stick to the script" and he would robotically do as he was told. But something else was going on. Maybe momma did die, but that wasn't what was at the center of things. That was just a part of it. We'll see how much of a stomach Mr Olbermann has. Just give him a few more months of this.
People like Alex Jones though, he's bought and paid for. He is more like Lonesome Rhodes. Or Bill O'Reilly. They both could make a claim for the title but they would be weak imitations. Alex Jones has one thing going for him. He knows that if he steamrolls everything and doesn't slow down to let anyone else in, he can continue. But eventually younger blood will have to step in. O'Reilly the same way. His time is short too just because of age. Stretch your skin all you want, it doesn't turn back the clock. It just stretches your skin.
I have to admit that I am addicted to the news. I watch it. I have to. Because I know that the talking heads (regardless of shilling) are going to slip up and tell some truth. The only way we will ever get the truth is when someone slips up and lets some out. This is my opinion, there are others who violently disagree with this. But most people are too lazy to search for truth. They will tell you they don't have the time and some will even say they don't have the inclination, nor do they care. Those are the people who helped this situation along the most. I would blame them but it does no good. They are such experts at knowing how to not take blame for anything it does no good.
What I find astounding is the fact that most people have the nerve to try and argue that there is a difference between mainstream media and alternative media. But when you press them to distinguish the differences they can only prove that there are none. If you listen closely to both you will hear no difference. They both talk about the state of the situation. They both talk about citizenship, birthright, intelligence, transparency, health care, insurance, money, jobs, etc. They all talk about it. They just give their opinions on it. Without one the other would have no show. Example:
Keith Olbermann would have no show without Billo O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, etc. Those are the guys he has focused on. Those are his foils. By watching and listening to Keith you are naturally going to be curious about the others. Keith will play snippets and clips of those guys and your curiosity will be aroused. Now you have to hear for yourself what was said. Once you do that you are listening to them more often because they are bashing Olbermann. It's a game.
Chris Matthews has a hard on for the "Wing Nuts". Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin, Bill O'Reilly, Fox News, the Tea Party, etc. The more they talk about this stuff the more curious people get and want to check it out.
Same thing all the way around.
Rush Limbaugh talks about Fox and MSNBC constantly. He praises his enemies, thanks God for his enemies. They are his foils. He forces his listeners to check these people out by prophetically telling his listeners what the media and political elites are going to do. That is his speciality.
Mark Levin talks about the same thing but he uses cute little pet names for them all which of course raises curiousity.
IT'S A GAME AND IT WORKS LIKE A CHARM.
So one year later what do we have? Not much. Just worse. The talking heads tell you things are getting better. But all one has to do is look around him/herself and see if things are getting better or not. I don't see them getting better around me. But we have the future to look forward to (they will tell you). 40% higher taxes, forced health care, can't talk, can't think, can't act, can't work, can't eat, can't do nothing. Unless the government tells you that you can. That's what we have and are getting more of. Is this what they call the "good stuff"? I know it's change that you BETTER BELEIVE IN.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
